United States to ask the Chinese "bundle" Sudan: China says no! (go) _ the parable of the parabola

Mk800 comments: not long ago, the United States White House asked the Chinese Government to step up for the Sudan National "bundle" of China and is given a "mild". Chinese think: this is the internal affairs of the Sudanese national, although China has a responsibility to assist in the development of the Sudan, but the Chinese have no right to unauthorized interference in the internal affairs of States of Sudan. While the United States in international affairs experts is to explain the Sudan. United States international affairs experts said: China in the Sudan have achieved all of the "operational control". But recently, the Chinese Government has once again announced on behalf of the United Nations Sudan about 500 "peacekeepers" these forces mainly to assist military-based. At present, China's deployment of troops in Sudan, more than about 1000 people. China in Sudan with large building, oil exploitation, base, in 2005 the EU joint "deterrence" exercise, the actual target points to is the extreme lack of Sudan this "human rights". But at that time, mainly because China is Sudan's real presence, therefore, as the EU unilaterally, offend China will inevitably lead to Europe's economic, political, turbulence of succession. Therefore, the exercise took the necessary distance to "evasion". To form gives Sudan a deterrent. However, this country because of China, the presence of giants, therefore all the more outrageous. And we, as well as the country's Foreign Affairs Committee, the White House and President Bush has to do with China achieved consensus, not long ago, the u.s.-China Summit meeting with the special telephone, President Bush on this issue and hope to provide the solution to the question of the Sudan, as well as assist. While China has on this performance is not so positive. China has always considered that the internal human rights belong to the Sudan National Internal Affairs of China in this does not intervene in the internal affairs of States of Sudan, at the same time, China also expressed could not accept the EU may be taken against Sudan "certain scale military operation". This may result in China and the EU between unnecessary conflicts. Therefore, it is resolved, in accordance with the Sudan to the international forms are not a United States can be individually addressed, he must involve Chinese exchanges and communication. In the absence of support and assistance to China, the United States is less likely to use in addition to the "peace" means other than to resolve the problem of the Sudan. Because of the situation and the Iraq war began phase of Iraq is not the same. Here the United States and China's complex international transactions. While the EU for military deterrence, in China, the Sudan, it is obviously not in place of performance, so unless China eventually promised to solve the problem of the Sudan, both the United States and Eu, must be avoided and China's real "military motorcycle gap" that we could not imagine. Mk800 comments are for reference only